Comments on: Chip Kelly’s (Buck) Read Sweep https://www.syedschemes.com/read-sweep/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=read-sweep Analyzing Football X's and O's from a Coach's Perspective Fri, 06 Nov 2015 14:29:43 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1 By: DS11 https://www.syedschemes.com/read-sweep/#comment-510 Fri, 06 Nov 2015 14:29:43 +0000 http://www.syedschemes.com/?p=876#comment-510 In reply to tedseay.

I appreciate your insight– younger generation of coaches can definitely learn from older!

]]>
By: tedseay https://www.syedschemes.com/read-sweep/#comment-509 Fri, 06 Nov 2015 13:46:52 +0000 http://www.syedschemes.com/?p=876#comment-509 In reply to DS11.

The inside run threat (Wing-T Buck Trap) precedes the C/D gap threat of Wing-T Buck Sweep, forcing the defense to prioritize “A” gap defense first — and lest we forget, Buck Sweep a la Wing-T is not a hashes/numbers/sideline play by design.

In short, I still have a problem calling any of these variations “buck sweep”, but that is probably because I am older than dirt…

😉

]]>
By: DS11 https://www.syedschemes.com/read-sweep/#comment-504 Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:20:48 +0000 http://www.syedschemes.com/?p=876#comment-504 In reply to tedseay.

Great point. I agree the clips shown are actually a number of different plays. (Jab Sweep, Lombardi Sweep, etc) I’ve consolidated them for explanation purposes so someone who is new to the game will be able to recognize the general blocking scheme and learn. (Hence the “buck” in parenthesis) With respect to the inside run threat to be true buck sweep, I’d consider the Michael Vick clip a modern version of the buck sweep, where the Quarterback can act as the inside run threat.

]]>
By: tedseay https://www.syedschemes.com/read-sweep/#comment-503 Thu, 05 Nov 2015 20:53:58 +0000 http://www.syedschemes.com/?p=876#comment-503 “Buck sweep” is a Wing-T play based around an inside run threat by the fullback (i.e., a “line buck”, as they were known c. 1920).

Read Sweep, sure; power sweep, fine, Lombardi sweep, no problem — none of them involve an inside run fake. Just don’t call this “buck sweep”…

]]>